Cole v. Mrotek

56 F. App'x 619
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2003·No. No. 02-2102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George A. Cole, II, appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396, 109 S.Ct. 1865, 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989); Anderson v. Russell, 247 F.3d 125, 129 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 949, 122 S.Ct. 342, 151 L.Ed.2d 258 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Cole v. Mrotek, No. CA-01-2626 (D.Md. Sept. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Mrotek, 56 F. App'x 619 (4th Cir. 2003).

56 F. App'x 619 (Cole v. Mrotek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. Connor
490 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1989)