Cole v. Mrotek

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 10, 2003
• Docket: 02-2102
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2102

GEORGE A. COLE, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUNNY MROTEK, Officer, Prince George’s County; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; STATE OF MARYLAND; PAUL DOUGHERTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 2626)

Submitted: February 13, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George A. Cole, II, Appellant Pro Se. Krystal Quinn Alves, OFFICE OF LAW FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

George A. Cole, II, appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the

existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Graham v.

Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989); Anderson v. Russell, 247 F.3d

125, 129 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 125 (2001).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Cole v.

Mrotek, No. CA-01-2626 (D. Md. Sept. 5, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED