Cole v. Matchett

Indiana Supreme Court

Cole v. Matchett

78 Ind. 601

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1881

DocketNo. 8674

StatusPublished

This text of 78 Ind. 601 (Cole v. Matchett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. Matchett, 78 Ind. 601 (Ind. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Howk, J.

In this case, the facts alleged in the appellant’s complaint,, and the question for decision, are substantially the same in every material particular, and presented in the same manner, as those which were fully considered and passed upon by this court in the recent case of Ward v. Haggard, 75 Ind. 381. The case cited was approved and followed in Kelsey v. McLaughlin, 76 Ind. 379. The cases cited are decisive of the case now under consideration. The court did not err in sustaining the appellees' demurrer to the appellant’s complaint.

The judgment is affirmed, at the appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howk, J.

In this case, the facts alleged in the appellant’s complaint,, and the question for decision, are substantially the same in every material particular, and presented in the same manner, as those which were fully considered and passed upon by this court in the recent case of Ward v. Haggard, 75 Ind. 381. The case cited was approved and followed in Kelsey v. McLaughlin, 76 Ind. 379. The cases cited are decisive of the case now under consideration. The court did not err in sustaining the appellees' demurrer to the appellant’s complaint.

The judgment is affirmed, at the appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 Ind. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-matchett-ind-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack