Cole v. Manning

372 U.S. 521, 83 S. Ct. 888, 9 L. Ed. 2d 966, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1948
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 1963
Docket610, Misc
StatusPublished

This text of 372 U.S. 521 (Cole v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Manning, 372 U.S. 521, 83 S. Ct. 888, 9 L. Ed. 2d 966, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1948 (1963).

Opinion

372 U.S. 521 (1963)

COLE ET AL.
v.
MANNING, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.

No. 610, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 18, 1963.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

Theodore W. Law, Jr. for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Victor S. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 U.S. 521, 83 S. Ct. 888, 9 L. Ed. 2d 966, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-manning-scotus-1963.