Cole v. Manning
372 U.S. 521, 83 S. Ct. 888, 9 L. Ed. 2d 966, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1948
This text of 372 U.S. 521 (Cole v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cole v. Manning, 372 U.S. 521, 83 S. Ct. 888, 9 L. Ed. 2d 966, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1948 (1963).
Opinion
COLE ET AL.
v.
MANNING, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
Supreme Court of United States.
Theodore W. Law, Jr. for appellants.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Victor S. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
372 U.S. 521, 83 S. Ct. 888, 9 L. Ed. 2d 966, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-manning-scotus-1963.