Cole v. Law

Supreme Court of Alabama

Cole v. Law

76 So. 995, 200 Ala. 697

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 25, 1917

Docket4 Div. 683.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 So. 995 (Cole v. Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. Law, 76 So. 995, 200 Ala. 697 (Ala. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed affidavit of inability to give security for costs, and that she is a married woman, the widow of Nathan Cole; but the court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 715, amending section 2879, Code 1907, does not apply to this appeal. It is therefore ordered that, unless appellants give security for costs within 60 days from May 10, 1917, the appeal be dismissed. Appellants failing to give security as required,- the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed affidavit of inability to give security for costs, and that she is a married woman, the widow of Nathan Cole; but the court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 715, amending section 2879, Code 1907, does not apply to this appeal. It is therefore ordered that, unless appellants give security for costs within 60 days from May 10, 1917, the appeal be dismissed. Appellants failing to give security as required,- the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 So. 995, 200 Ala. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-law-ala-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack