Cole v. Law

Supreme Court of Alabama

Cole v. Law

76 So. 995, 200 Ala. 697

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 25, 1917·No. 4 Div. 683.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed affidavit of inability to give security for costs, and that she is a married woman, the widow of Nathan Cole; but the court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 715, amending section 2879, Code 1907, does not apply to this appeal. It is therefore ordered that, unless appellants give security for costs within 60 days from May 10, 1917, the appeal be dismissed. Appellants failing to give security as required,- the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed affidavit of inability to give security for costs, and that she is a married woman, the widow of Nathan Cole; but the court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 715, amending section 2879, Code 1907, does not apply to this appeal. It is therefore ordered that, unless appellants give security for costs within 60 days from May 10, 1917, the appeal be dismissed. Appellants failing to give security as required,- the appeal is dismissed.

Cole v. Law, 76 So. 995, 200 Ala. 697 (Ala. 1917).

Pincite

76 So. 995 (Cole v. Law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related