Cole v. Food Lion, LLC

156 F. App'x 552
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2005·No. No. 05-1624·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rita Cole appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 motion for summary judgment in this diversity action. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988). A motion for summary judgment may be granted if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cole v. Food Lion, LLC, 370 F.Supp.2d 434 (E.D.Va.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Food Lion, LLC, 156 F. App'x 552 (4th Cir. 2005).

156 F. App'x 552 (Cole v. Food Lion, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cole v. Food Lion, L.L.C.
370 F. Supp. 2d 434 (E.D. Virginia, 2005)
Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
863 F.2d 1162 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)