Cole v. Cole

182 A.D.2d 526

This text of 182 A.D.2d 526 (Cole v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Cole, 182 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), dated June 27, 1990, as awarded the plaintiff pendente lite counsel fees in the amount of $5,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, we find that the award of interim counsel fees was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion. The plaintiff is a homemaker, unemployed outside the home, whose only income is interest from a trust fund established with funds she inherited from her father. The principal of the trust is approximately $110,000 and the income interest is approximately $8,000 a year. The defendant has an annual gross income of about $97,000. Thus, the plaintiff’s financial need and the parties’ disparate incomes support the award (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; Hausman v Hausman, 162 AD2d 590). Further, we note that indigency is not a prerequisite to an award of counsel fees and a party is not required to exhaust his or her own capital in order to qualify for an interim counsel fee award (see, Hyman v Hyman, 56 AD2d 337; Hinden v Hinden, 122 Mise 2d 552). Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyman v. Hyman
56 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Hausman v. Hausman
162 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-cole-nyappdiv-1992.