Cole v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cole v. City of Atlanta

357 S.E.2d 257, 257 Ga. 145

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 4, 1987

Docket44461

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.E.2d 257 (Cole v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cole v. City of Atlanta, 357 S.E.2d 257, 257 Ga. 145 (Ga. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is an action for mandamus, declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and contract damages. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed except [146]*146to the extent that the trial court dismissed the appellants’ claim for contract damages. We find that this claim should not have been dismissed.

Decided June 4, 1987. Austin E. Catts, Robert C. Koski, for appellants. Kendric E. Smith, Marva Jones Brooks, Overtis L. Hicks, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI