Cole v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cole v. City of Atlanta

357 S.E.2d 257, 257 Ga. 145

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 4, 1987·No. 44461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is an action for mandamus, declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and contract damages. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed except [146]*146to the extent that the trial court dismissed the appellants’ claim for contract damages. We find that this claim should not have been dismissed.

Decided June 4, 1987. Austin E. Catts, Robert C. Koski, for appellants. Kendric E. Smith, Marva Jones Brooks, Overtis L. Hicks, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

This is an action for mandamus, declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and contract damages. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed except [146]*146to the extent that the trial court dismissed the appellants’ claim for contract damages. We find that this claim should not have been dismissed.

Decided June 4, 1987. Austin E. Catts, Robert C. Koski, for appellants. Kendric E. Smith, Marva Jones Brooks, Overtis L. Hicks, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part.

All the Justices concur.

Cole v. City of Atlanta, 357 S.E.2d 257, 257 Ga. 145 (Ga. 1987).

Pincite

357 S.E.2d 257 (Cole v. City of Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related