Cole v. Baltimore City Police Department
This text of 631 F. App'x 168 (Cole v. Baltimore City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vincent Michael Cole appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cole v. Balt. City Police Dep’t, No. 8:14-cv-02787-PWG, 2015 WL 4647799 (D.Md. Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [169]*169adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
631 F. App'x 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-baltimore-city-police-department-ca4-2016.