Cole v. Baltimore City Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Cole v. Baltimore City Police Department

631 F. App'x 168

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2016·No. No. 15-7322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Michael Cole appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cole v. Balt. City Police Dep’t, No. 8:14-cv-02787-PWG, 2015 WL 4647799 (D.Md. Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [169] adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Michael Cole appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cole v. Balt. City Police Dep’t, No. 8:14-cv-02787-PWG, 2015 WL 4647799 (D.Md. Aug. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [169] adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cole v. Baltimore City Police Department, 631 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

631 F. App'x 168 (Cole v. Baltimore City Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related