Cole v. Arlington State Bank
This text of 74 N.W. 1100 (Cole v. Arlington State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles D. Cole instituted two' actions of replevin to' recover certain chattels, one being against the Arlington State Bank, and the other against the Blair State Bank. The causes were consolidated and tried as one action. The verdict was for the defendants, and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff has prosecuted this proceeding.
[633]*633The three assignments argued in the brief filed relate to the rulings of the court below on the admission of evidence, and they cannot be considered, since there is no bill of exceptions included in the transcript. (Sweeney v. Ramge, 46 Neb. 919; Reed v. Rice, 48 Neb. 586; McKenna v. Dietrich, 48 Neb. 483; Wood v. Gerhold, 47 Neb. 397; White v. Smith, 47 Neb. 625; Reynolds v. McCandless, 50 Neb. 225; Stuart v. Burcham, 50 Neb. 823; Douglas Smith, 50 Neb. 899.) The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.W. 1100, 54 Neb. 632, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-arlington-state-bank-neb-1898.