Cole v. Alexander

39 S.E. 477, 113 Ga. 1154, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 526
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 24, 1901·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

IiiriLE, J.

An action upon an account for money had and received, and for the erection of improvements on land, is not sustained by evidence showing that the defendant sold land to the plaintiff and received a part of the purchase-money ; and that the latter, while in possession, made improvements on the premises and then abandoned the same from fear of personal violence on the part of the defendant.

Taking the evidence most strongly for the plaintiff, he did not establish the cause of action set forth in his petition, and therefore was not entitled to recover. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Alexander, 39 S.E. 477, 113 Ga. 1154, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 526 (Ga. 1901).

39 S.E. 477 (Cole v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grande Ronde Lumber Co. v. Buchanan
248 P.2d 394 (Washington Supreme Court, 1952)
Lewis v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.
274 P. 1055 (Washington Supreme Court, 1929)