Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC

Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC

88 A.D.3d 452, 930 N.Y.2d 435
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 452 (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC, 88 A.D.3d 452, 930 N.Y.2d 435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The stipulation on which defendants rely does not clearly and unambiguously manifest an intent on plaintiffs part to release defendants from future rent obligations under the lease (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 968 [1988]; NAB Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 276 AD2d 388 [2000]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Renwick, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal Insurance
520 N.E.2d 512 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
NAB Construction Corp. v. City of New York
276 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 452, 930 N.Y.2d 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-schotz-meisel-forman-leonard-pa-v-stanton-crenshaw-nyappdiv-2011.