Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC
88 A.D.3d 452, 930 N.Y.2d 435
Opinion
The stipulation on which defendants rely does not clearly and unambiguously manifest an intent on plaintiffs part to release defendants from future rent obligations under the lease (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 968 [1988]; NAB Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 276 AD2d 388 [2000]).
We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Renwick, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC, 88 A.D.3d 452, 930 N.Y.2d 435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
88 A.D.3d 452 (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal Insurance
520 N.E.2d 512 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
NAB Construction Corp. v. City of New York
276 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)