Cole Borg v. State of Florida
This text of 169 So. 3d 261 (Cole Borg v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON CONCESSION OF ERROR
Based on appellee’s concession of error, we reverse the order denying appellant’s *262 petition to seal records and remand to the trial court for a new hearing prior to July-25, 2015 1 on appellant’s motion filed pursuant to section 943.059(1), Florida Statutes (2014). See Gotowala v. State, 162 So.3d 33, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). The trial court’s order denying sealing of records did not consider the facts and circumstances of the individual case and denied relief based upon generalized considerations, which is not a proper exercise of its discretion. See V.F.D v. State, 19 So.3d 1172 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Godoy v. State, 845 So.2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
. Petitioner received the authorized certificate of eligibility to apply for a petition to seal from the Department of Corrections. That certificate was for one year, which ends on July 25, 2015. Our expedition of this appeal and direction to the court to hold a prompt hearing seeks to have the matter concluded within the year period, so that petitioner does not have to reapply for certification. See § 943.0585(2), Fla. Stat. (2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 So. 3d 261, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10405, 2015 WL 4111328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-borg-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.