Colden v. Botts
12 Wend. 234
Opinion
In a caase a certiorari was sued out to remove proceedings had under the statute, 2 R. S, 511, &c. authorizing summary proceedings to obtain the possession of land in certain cases, and a return had been made to the writ, and on motion by the defendant to quash the certiorari, it was held, by the Chief Justice, that a party having no interest in the subject matter of the proceedings was not entitled to prosecute a certiorari, and he accordingly quashed the writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colden v. Botts, 12 Wend. 234 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).
12 Wend. 234 (Colden v. Botts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stout v. Mercer
312 N.E.2d 515 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1974)
City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning Appeals
284 N.E.2d 119 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1972)
Metropolitan Dev. Com'n of Marion Co. v. Cullison
277 N.E.2d 905 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1972)
In re Colmes
151 Misc. 222 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
State ex rel. Combs v. Staten
187 S.W. 42 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1916)
State ex rel. Lamb v. Gillilan
75 A. 711 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1910)
McFarland v. Pierce
45 N.E. 706 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
People Ex Rel. Blakslee v. Commissioners of Land Office
32 N.E. 139 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Gaines v. Linn County
28 P. 133 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)
People v. Leavitt
2 N.W. 812 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Canyonville & Galesville Road Co. v. County of Douglas
5 Or. 280 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1874)
People Ex Rel. Sheridan v. . Andrews
52 N.Y. 445 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
People ex rel. Lawrence v. Schell
5 Lans. 352 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)