Cold Spring Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Selleck
This text of 232 A.D. 680 (Cold Spring Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Selleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that, by reason of the stays that had been granted up to and including the time when the Court of Appeals denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal, the time within which plaintiff was to remove the poles had not expired when defendants removed them, or, in any event, a reasonable time from the time of the determination of the Court of Appeals within which plaintiff should remove the poles had not been fixed by the Special Term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cold-spring-light-heat-power-co-v-selleck-nyappdiv-1931.