Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

Third Circuit

Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

115 F.2d 33, 47 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 105, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2783

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 20, 1940

DocketNos. 6701, 6702

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 115 F.2d 33 (Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp., 115 F.2d 33, 47 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 105, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2783 (3d Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation filed by the parties in the above appeals, from which it appears that the same are moot, the opinion of this court filed June 15, 1939 (3 Cir., 108 F.2d 322) is hereby withdrawn, the orders of this court entered thereon on June 15, 1939, are hereby vacated, the decree of the District Court for the District of New Jersey entered February 14, 1938, in so far as it relates to United States Patents Nos. 1,744,016 and 1,779,195, is reversed and the cause is remanded to the said District Court, with directions to vacate its said decree in so far as it relates to said Patents Nos. 1,744,016 and 1,779,195, and to dismiss the bills of complaint as to the said patents upon the ground that the cause as to them is moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation filed by the parties in the above appeals, from which it appears that the same are moot, the opinion of this court filed June 15, 1939 (3 Cir., 108 F.2d 322) is hereby withdrawn, the orders of this court entered thereon on June 15, 1939, are hereby vacated, the decree of the District Court for the District of New Jersey entered February 14, 1938, in so far as it relates to United States Patents Nos. 1,744,016 and 1,779,195, is reversed and the cause is remanded to the said District Court, with directions to vacate its said decree in so far as it relates to said Patents Nos. 1,744,016 and 1,779,195, and to dismiss the bills of complaint as to the said patents upon the ground that the cause as to them is moot.

Cold Metal Process Company and the Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. E. W. Bliss Company, E. W. Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process Company and the Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee, Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. Greer Steel Company, Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, Trustee v. E. W. Bliss Company

285 F.2d 231 (Sixth Circuit, 1960)

Inland Steel Products Co. v. MPH Manufacturing Corp.

25 F.R.D. 236 (N.D. Illinois, 1959)

The Cold Metal Process Company v. United Engineering & Foundry Company

235 F.2d 224 (Third Circuit, 1956)

Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.

123 F. Supp. 525 (N.D. Ohio, 1954)

Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.

190 F.2d 217 (Third Circuit, 1951)

Union Nat. Bank of Youngstown v. Superior Steel Corp.

9 F.R.D. 117 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)

Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel Corporation

41 F. Supp. 487 (E.D. Michigan, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 F.2d 33, 47 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 105, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cold-metal-process-co-v-carnegie-illinois-steel-corp-ca3-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack