Colcock v. Wainright
This text of 1 S.C.L. 114 (Colcock v. Wainright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even if a settlement were made by parties at this day, though different from the depreciation table, it would bind them. This is a liberal action, and the jury can do what appears to them to be equitable and conscientious. 'There are two questions. 1. Whether the depreciation table dees apply ; and I think it does not in this case. 2, Whether this was a fair and voluntary settlement; I think it was. The house appears to have been worth then, as well as now, the sum fixed by the arbitrators. Nothing appears to impeach the transaction,
Verdict for defendant,
See the case of M'Graw and wife v. Lowndes, vol. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 S.C.L. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colcock-v-wainright-pactcompl-1790.