Colclough v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Colclough v. Walker

90 S.E. 742, 19 Ga. App. 23, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 14

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 22, 1916

Docket7564, 7565

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 742 (Colclough v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colclough v. Walker, 90 S.E. 742, 19 Ga. App. 23, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 14 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. The judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari. Waiving the question as to the authority of a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta to set aside a default judgment in that court after the expiration of the trial term, it appears from the record that the matters urged by the defendant in that court as a sufficient reason for setting aside the judgment against him were matters of defense which could have been presented'by plea in bar of such judgment. It does not appear that there was a sufficient legal excuse for the failure to interpose these defenses. Where failure to file a defense was due to the gross negligence of the defendant or of his counsel, it is not error to refuse to set aside a default judgment and reinstate a case, even though motion be made at the same term. Athens Leather Manufacturing Co. v. Myers, 98 Ga. 396, 397 (25 S. E. 503). Neither is the failure of a defendant to appear and' plead on account of an apparent misunderstanding between himself and his counsel, whereby no appearance whatever was entered, a sufficient ground for setting aside a default judgment. Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co., 109 Ga. 798 (35 S. E. 168).

2. Since the ruling of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case must finally govern the disposition of the case in the municipal court, and there was no question of fact that would make it necessary to send the case back for a new hearing in that court, the judge erred in net making a final decision in the case, instead of sending it back to that court. Civil Code, § 5201.

Judgment on the main hill of exceptions affirmed,- on cross-hill reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

1. The judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari. Waiving the question as to the authority of a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta to set aside a default judgment in that court after the expiration of the trial term, it appears from the record that the matters urged by the defendant in that court as a sufficient reason for setting aside the judgment against him were matters of defense which could have been presented'by plea in bar of such judgment. It does not appear that there was a sufficient legal excuse for the failure to interpose these defenses. Where failure to file a defense was due to the gross negligence of the defendant or of his counsel, it is not error to refuse to set aside a default judgment and reinstate a case, even though motion be made at the same term. Athens Leather Manufacturing Co. v. Myers, 98 Ga. 396, 397 (25 S. E. 503). Neither is the failure of a defendant to appear and' plead on account of an apparent misunderstanding between himself and his counsel, whereby no appearance whatever was entered, a sufficient ground for setting aside a default judgment. Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co., 109 Ga. 798 (35 S. E. 168).

2. Since the ruling of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case must finally govern the disposition of the case in the municipal court, and there was no question of fact that would make it necessary to send the case back for a new hearing in that court, the judge erred in net making a final decision in the case, instead of sending it back to that court. Civil Code, § 5201.

Judgment on the main hill of exceptions affirmed,- on cross-hill reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.E. 742, 19 Ga. App. 23, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colclough-v-walker-gactapp-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack