Colclough v. Baynard

Supreme Court of Florida

Colclough v. Baynard

119 So. 388, 96 Fla. 866

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 7, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 119 So. 388 (Colclough v. Baynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colclough v. Baynard, 119 So. 388, 96 Fla. 866 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment *867 to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there-is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment, of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment *867 to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there-is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment, of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 So. 388, 96 Fla. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colclough-v-baynard-fla-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack