Colchester v. Lazaro

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided December 23, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-01571·Unknown

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re: CASE NO. C20-1571-JCC

SETH BASIL COLCHESTER, ORDER Petitioner, v. Respondent.

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated and unopposed motions to seal (Dkt. Nos. 8, 20, 27). The Court starts from the position that “[t]here is a strong presumption of public access to [its] files.” W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 5(g)(3); see Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). To overcome that presumption, the movant must show that there are “compelling reasons” to seal the documents at issue. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 2016) (holding that the “compelling reasons” standard applies to any motion that “is more than tangentially related to the merits of a case”). The Court finds compelling reasons to seal the documents, which contain sensitive and confidential information that, if made public, could cause irreparable harm. Accordingly, the court GRANTS the motion to seal (Dkt. Nos. 8, 20, 27) and DIRECTS the Clerk to maintain Docket Numbers 9, 10, 11, 11-1, 21, 30, 51, 51-1 under seal until further order of the Court. DATED this 23rd day of December 2020. A John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colchester v. Lazaro, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Colchester v. Lazaro (Colchester v. Lazaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.
435 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)