Colby v. Campbell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Colby v. Campbell

44 A. 104, 70 N.H. 629

DecidedJune 5, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A. 104 (Colby v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colby v. Campbell, 44 A. 104, 70 N.H. 629 (N.H. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Wallace, J.

If the taking of security was intended as a waiver of the lien, the verdict must stand. Whether the acts of the parties and the other evidence established a waiver was a question of fact to be decided at the trial term (Pickett v. Bullock, 52 N. H. 354; Fuller v. Brown, 67 N. H. 188; Estes v. Insurance Co., 67 N. H. 462), and the case presents no question of law.

Exception overruled.

Y oung, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace, J.

If the taking of security was intended as a waiver of the lien, the verdict must stand. Whether the acts of the parties and the other evidence established a waiver was a question of fact to be decided at the trial term (Pickett v. Bullock, 52 N. H. 354; Fuller v. Brown, 67 N. H. 188; Estes v. Insurance Co., 67 N. H. 462), and the case presents no question of law.

Exception overruled.

Y oung, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A. 104, 70 N.H. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colby-v-campbell-nh-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack