Colburn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Colburn v. State

1910 OK CR 129, 109 P. 1114, 4 Okla. Crim. 14, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 32

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 26, 1910

DocketNo. A-423.

StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 129 (Colburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colburn v. State, 1910 OK CR 129, 109 P. 1114, 4 Okla. Crim. 14, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 32 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Beckham county for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, and was on May 17, 1909, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of 60 days and to pay a fine of $150, from which judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court a petition in error, with case-made attached, ón November 11, 1909. No briefs have been filed. Counsel for the state on March 26, 1910, filed a motion to dismiss or affirm said cause for want of prosecution, to which motion no response *15 has been made. We have examined the record; and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The motion to affirm is therefore sustained, and the judgment of the county court of Beckham county is in all things affirmed, and the cause remanded, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Beckham county for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, and was on May 17, 1909, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of 60 days and to pay a fine of $150, from which judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court a petition in error, with case-made attached, ón November 11, 1909. No briefs have been filed. Counsel for the state on March 26, 1910, filed a motion to dismiss or affirm said cause for want of prosecution, to which motion no response *15 has been made. We have examined the record; and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The motion to affirm is therefore sustained, and the judgment of the county court of Beckham county is in all things affirmed, and the cause remanded, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK CR 129, 109 P. 1114, 4 Okla. Crim. 14, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colburn-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.