Colburn v. Downes
10 Mass. 20
Opinion
The bond is unquestionably sufficient to hold the defendant. Notwithstanding the extreme carelessness of the sheriff, or his clerk, the bond contains a sufficient description of the plaintiffs. Let the execution issue, as prayed for.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colburn v. Downes, 10 Mass. 20 (Mass. 1813).
10 Mass. 20 (Colburn v. Downes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flagg v. Jones
113 Mass. 325 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Williamson's Administrators v. Hall
1 Ohio St. (N.S.) 190 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1853)
Gayle v. Hudson
10 Ala. 116 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1846)
Bull v. Clarke
43 Mass. 587 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1841)
Glezen v. Rood
43 Mass. 490 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1841)
Coomes v. Burt
39 Mass. 422 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1840)
Chapel v. Congdon
35 Mass. 257 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1836)
Hamner v. Cobb
2 Stew. & P. 383 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1832)
Schieffelin v. Harvey
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 76 (New York Supreme Court, 1808)