Colbert v. Warden
This text of 60 A.2d 181 (Colbert v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson v. Warden of Maryland House ofCorrection,
Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence of three years for burglary. He alleges that by mistake he entered the wrong house and through fear ran upstairs and hid in a closet when the police were coming, that he was not guilty and the court refused him a postponement to get two witnesses. It does not appear whether or not the witnesses were summoned or to what they would testify if present. There is no showing of abuse of discretion in refusing postponement. The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence and details (not fundamental) of procedure cannot be retried on habeas corpus. Olewiler v.Brady,
Application denied, without costs. *Page 728
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.2d 181, 190 Md. 726, 1947 Md. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colbert-v-warden-md-1947.