Colbert v. The Moore Law Group

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 31, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-00990·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 ANGELA ANAYA COLBERT, 4 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00990-GMN-NJK 5 vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND THE MOORE LAW GROUP, et al., RECOMMENDATION 7 Defendants. 8

9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 6), of 10 United States Magistrate Nancy J. Koppe, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint 11 without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline. 12 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 13 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 14 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 15 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 16 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 17 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 18 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 19 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 20 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 21 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 22 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 23 filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 24 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 25 No. 6) (setting a January 28, 2025 deadline for objections). 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 6), is 3 || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 5 Dated this 31 day of January, 2025. Yj, Glofia M. Navarro, District Judge 8 U ge States District Court 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colbert v. The Moore Law Group, (D. Nev. 2025).

Colbert v. The Moore Law Group (Colbert v. The Moore Law Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related