Colbert v. State
69 S.E. 315, 8 Ga. App. 407, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 188
Opinion
The evidence authorized the conviction of the. defendant, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. The fact that the defendant was engaged with others in playing cards, in connection with the language used by the players, and with the fact that money was seen upon the table, was sufficient to authorize the inference that the players were gambling. ■ Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colbert v. State, 69 S.E. 315, 8 Ga. App. 407, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
69 S.E. 315 (Colbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McFarlin v. State
83 S.E. 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)