Colbert v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Colbert v. State

79 So. 146, 16 Ala. App. 472, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 160

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 1918·No. 8 Div. 611.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. The proceedings appear regular in every respect, and show a judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty of the offense of miscegenation, following a verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant in due form, sentencing him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 3 years. The certificate of the clerk shows that more than 90 days have elapsed since the judgment of conviction and notation of appeal by defendant, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented. No error appearing in the record, the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. The proceedings appear regular in every respect, and show a judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty of the offense of miscegenation, following a verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant in due form, sentencing him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 3 years. The certificate of the clerk shows that more than 90 days have elapsed since the judgment of conviction and notation of appeal by defendant, and that no bill of exceptions has been presented. No error appearing in the record, the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Colbert v. State, 79 So. 146, 16 Ala. App. 472, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 160 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

79 So. 146 (Colbert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.