Colbert v. Riveria
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8155
DONALD LOUIS COLBERT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MILDRED RIVERIA; ANITA JONES; RIKANTAS MAJAUSKAS, MD; HARRELL WATTS, Administrator,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
HARRY LEPPIN, a/k/a Harley G. Lappin, Director of FBOP,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00848-CMC)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Louis Colbert, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Donald Louis Colbert, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Colbert v. Riveria, No. 2:09-cv-00848-
CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colbert v. Riveria (Colbert v. Riveria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.