Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 25, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2010-1794·Published

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA O n 1 5 2010 Clefit U.S. Distnct & Bankruptcy Antonio Colbert, Courts for the District of Columbia

Plaintiff, 1 ) v. Civil Action No. 1 i 3 Ii'94 1 Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio,

Defendant. 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application

to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (requiring dismissal of a complaint upon a

determination that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted).

Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Clerk of Court for the Southern District

of Ohio for allegedly refusing to send him "adequit (sic) forms for my case against PNC Bank."

Compl. at 2. Although he pleads no injury, plaintiff seeks $1 million in damages. The complaint

is devoid of a cognizable claim. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum

Ovinion.

Date: October r+- s, 20 10

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio, (D.D.C. 2010).

Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio (Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.