Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio
This text of Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio (Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA O n 1 5 2010 Clefit U.S. Distnct & Bankruptcy Antonio Colbert, Courts for the District of Columbia
Plaintiff, 1 ) v. Civil Action No. 1 i 3 Ii'94 1 Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio,
Defendant. 1
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application
to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be
dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (requiring dismissal of a complaint upon a
determination that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted).
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues the Clerk of Court for the Southern District
of Ohio for allegedly refusing to send him "adequit (sic) forms for my case against PNC Bank."
Compl. at 2. Although he pleads no injury, plaintiff seeks $1 million in damages. The complaint
is devoid of a cognizable claim. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum
Ovinion.
Date: October r+- s, 20 10
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Colbert v. Office of the Clerk of Southern District of Ohio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colbert-v-office-of-the-clerk-of-southern-district-dcd-2010.