Home/New York Court of Appeals/Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.

Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.

406 N.E.2d 1080, 49 N.Y.2d 988, 429 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2345
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 29, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 406 N.E.2d 1080 (Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc., 406 N.E.2d 1080, 49 N.Y.2d 988, 429 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2345 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

[989]*989OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Based on the record before us, we agree with the Appellate Division that the employee receiving service possessed sufficient authority to accept service of process on behalf of appellant Southern Railway Co. (See Fashion Page v Zurich Ins. Co., 50 NY2d 265.)

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuschberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. King Chicken & Stuff, Inc.
35 A.D.3d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.
79 A.D.2d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 N.E.2d 1080, 49 N.Y.2d 988, 429 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colbert-v-international-security-bureau-inc-ny-1980.