Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc.
This text of Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc. (Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) ANTONIO COLBERT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-503 (JDB) ) HARRIS TEETER, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) )
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff filed this action in Superior Court against defendant Harris Teeter, Inc.,
complaining that his attempt to eat dinner at defendant’s establishment was interrupted by
security personnel who harassed him. Defendant removed the case and has now moved to
dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) and has alternatively moved for judgment on the pleadings under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). See Mot. to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for J. on the Pleadings,
ECF No. 4. The Court ordered plaintiff to respond to defendant’s motion on or before May 9,
2011 and warned plaintiff that failure to timely respond could result in defendant’s motion being
granted as conceded. Order, ECF No. 5. To date, plaintiff has not filed any response. The Court
will therefore grant the motion to dismiss as conceded and dismiss this case. A separate order
consistent with this Memorandum shall issue this date.
/s/ JOHN D. BATES DATE: May 18, 2011 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Colbert v. Harris Teeter, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colbert-v-harris-teeter-inc-dcd-2011.