Colbert v. Georgetown University Hospital

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Colbert v. Georgetown University Hospital

632 A.2d 119, 1993 WL 451408

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 1993

DocketNo. 91-CV-100

StatusPublished

This text of 632 A.2d 119 (Colbert v. Georgetown University Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colbert v. Georgetown University Hospital, 632 A.2d 119, 1993 WL 451408 (D.C. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, the opposition thereto, appellees’ motion for leave to file reply to opposition to petition, and the lodged reply, it is

ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ motion for leave to file reply is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply to opposition to petition; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of May 4, 1993, 623 A.2d 1244 are hereby vacated. It is

[120]*120FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before November 1, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI