Colbath v. Granite State Mutual Aid Ass'n

23 A. 623, 65 N.H. 669
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 23 A. 623 (Colbath v. Granite State Mutual Aid Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colbath v. Granite State Mutual Aid Ass'n, 23 A. 623, 65 N.H. 669 (N.H. 1889).

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The defendants admit that their contract, if binding, may be specifically enforced on the plaintiff’s bill in equity. The question of fraud may properly be tried by jury (Tasker v. Lord, 64 N. H. 279, 283) ; and all questions of fact will be determined, by the jury or by the court, at one trial. When the facts are found, the suit at law may not be needed. The question whether that suit can be maintained with or without an amendment of the declaration, is postponed until its examination appears to be necessary.

Case discharged.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tasker v. Lord
9 A. 220 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A. 623, 65 N.H. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colbath-v-granite-state-mutual-aid-assn-nh-1889.