Colavito v. Otto Stahl, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colavito v. Otto Stahl, Inc.

216 A.D. 790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D. 790 (Colavito v. Otto Stahl, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colavito v. Otto Stahl, Inc., 216 A.D. 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The orders appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the verdicts reinstated, and judgments entered thereon, with costs. Goldberg v. Burrows (185 App. Div. 244) and Cohen v. Cohen (191 id. 882) are very appropriate authorities for our determination. Present — Dowling, Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. Orders reversed, with costs, verdicts reinstated and judgments directed to be entered thereon, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The orders appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the verdicts reinstated, and judgments entered thereon, with costs. Goldberg v. Burrows (185 App. Div. 244) and Cohen v. Cohen (191 id. 882) are very appropriate authorities for our determination. Present — Dowling, Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. Orders reversed, with costs, verdicts reinstated and judgments directed to be entered thereon, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colavito-v-otto-stahl-inc-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack