Colasuonno v. Municipal Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colasuonno v. Municipal Housing Authority

12 A.D.2d 866, 210 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 A.D.2d 866 (Colasuonno v. Municipal Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colasuonno v. Municipal Housing Authority, 12 A.D.2d 866, 210 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant public housing authority has been dismissed at Special Term because of a failure to file a notice of claim within 90 days pursuant to section 50 -e of the General Municipal Law, which superseded “ inconsistent provisions of any general, special or local law * * * and shall be controlling.” (L. 1945, ch. 694, § 13.) It has been held that this shorter period, rather than the six-month period allowed by section 157 of the Public Housing Law is controlling. (Robinson v. New York City Housing Auth., 7 N Y 2d 908; cf. Public Housing Law, § 3.) Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Albany County. Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant public housing authority has been dismissed at Special Term because of a failure to file a notice of claim within 90 days pursuant to section 50 -e of the General Municipal Law, which superseded “ inconsistent provisions of any general, special or local law * * * and shall be controlling.” (L. 1945, ch. 694, § 13.) It has been held that this shorter period, rather than the six-month period allowed by section 157 of the Public Housing Law is controlling. (Robinson v. New York City Housing Auth., 7 N Y 2d 908; cf. Public Housing Law, § 3.) Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 866, 210 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colasuonno-v-municipal-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack