Colasante v. Nash

670 So. 2d 1078, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2822
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1996·No. No. 95-2757/3473·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties raise numerous issues on appeal and cross appeal. We find that the trial court did an excellent job in handling a difficult and complicated case. We find only one error: The trial court failed to award prejudgment interest as to the birth expenses which were awarded. Mason v. Reiter, 564 So.2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). We, therefore, remand for the award of prejudgment interest. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

JOANOS, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colasante v. Nash, 670 So. 2d 1078, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2822 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 1078 (Colasante v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mason v. Reiter
564 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)