Colarusso v. Colarusso

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Colarusso v. Colarusso

65 So. 3d 1132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10562, 2011 WL 3311754

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 2011

Docket3D09-2633

StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 3d 1132 (Colarusso v. Colarusso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colarusso v. Colarusso, 65 So. 3d 1132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10562, 2011 WL 3311754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (“A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion ...”). See also Clements v. Banks, 159 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); City of Coral Gables v. Brasher, 132 So.2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961) (stating issue of trial *1133 court’s alleged prejudice should have been raised and preserved below and could not properly be raised for first time on appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (“A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion ...”). See also Clements v. Banks, 159 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); City of Coral Gables v. Brasher, 132 So.2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961) (stating issue of trial *1133 court’s alleged prejudice should have been raised and preserved below and could not properly be raised for first time on appeal).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 So. 3d 1132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10562, 2011 WL 3311754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colarusso-v-colarusso-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack