Colarusso v. Colarusso

65 So. 3d 1132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10562, 2011 WL 3311754
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Colarusso v. Colarusso. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15803
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2011·No. 3D09-2633·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e) (“A motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion ...”). See also Clements v. Banks, 159 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); City of Coral Gables v. Brasher, 132 So.2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961) (stating issue of trial *1133 court’s alleged prejudice should have been raised and preserved below and could not properly be raised for first time on appeal).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colarusso v. Colarusso, 65 So. 3d 1132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10562, 2011 WL 3311754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

65 So. 3d 1132 (Colarusso v. Colarusso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clements v. Banks
159 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
City of Coral Gables v. Brasher
132 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)