Colaitis v. Colaitis

256 A.D.2d 300, 681 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13170

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated September 11, 1997, as awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee in the sum of $15,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in requiring the plaintiff to pay one-half of the defendant’s attorney’s fee (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879; Rice v Rice, 222 AD2d 493; Reehill v Reehill, 181 AD2d 725).

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colaitis v. Colaitis, 256 A.D.2d 300, 681 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 300 (Colaitis v. Colaitis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Reehill v. Reehill
181 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Rice v. Rice
222 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)