Colaitis v. Colaitis
Opinion
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated September 11, 1997, as awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee in the sum of $15,000.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in requiring the plaintiff to pay one-half of the defendant’s attorney’s fee (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879; Rice v Rice, 222 AD2d 493; Reehill v Reehill, 181 AD2d 725).
The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
256 A.D.2d 300 (Colaitis v. Colaitis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.