Col-An Entertainment Corp. v. Harper

325 F. Supp. 447, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14377
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1971
DocketNo. PCA 2294
StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. Supp. 447 (Col-An Entertainment Corp. v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Col-An Entertainment Corp. v. Harper, 325 F. Supp. 447, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14377 (N.D. Fla. 1971).

Opinion

FINAL JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before this Court ripe for final decision.

Evidence has been taken, argument of counsel has been heard, and the Court is advised.

Before the Court at this hearing are the recent opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States entered on February 23, 1971, such being as follows: Younger v. Harris, 400 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77, 91 S.Ct. 758, 27 L.Ed.2d 696 (1971); Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S.Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688 (1971); Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.Ed.2d 781 (1971); Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971); Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U.S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792 (1971).

This Court finds here presented no irreparable harm and injury that is both great and immediate, and no bad faith enforcement, sufficient to justify injunctive relief within the meaning of these opinions.

It therefore concludes that no injunctive relief should be granted, and that the prior temporary restraining order entered by the single judge should be dissolved.

At the time of this hearing, there are pending state court prosecutions in which all constitutional questions of Plaintiffs concerning the state statutes involved may be presented. Under these current decisions of the Supreme Court, this Court concludes that, for that reason, declaratory relief here sought respecting them should not be granted.

For these reasons, this Court should and does now proceed to final judgment, denying the relief sought and dismissing this action.

While Plaintiffs, in their complaint, raise questions respecting Florida’s nuisance statutes and a local ordinance, there is nothing in the evidence before the Court requiring or justifying any action by this Court on such questions.

Accordingly, it is

Ordered and adjudged as follows:

1. The temporary restraining order entered by the single judge on February 12, 1971 is hereby dissolved, vacated and set aside.

2. The prayer for the injunctive relief sought by Plaintiffs is hereby denied.

3. All other relief sought by Plaintiffs in this suit is hereby denied, and this suit is hereby dismissed at Plaintiffs’ cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Younger v. Harris
401 U.S. 37 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Boyle v. Landry
401 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Perez v. Ledesma
401 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Dyson v. Stein
401 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Byrne v. Karalexis
401 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F. Supp. 447, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/col-an-entertainment-corp-v-harper-flnd-1971.