Coker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Coker v. State

127 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 617

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 4, 1930

Docket7 Div. 625.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 918 (Coker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coker v. State, 127 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 617 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting en banc. We are of the-opinion, and hold, that the same was sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment rendered thereon. There is no other question apparent worthy of discussion.

We find no prejudicial error anywhere, either in the bill of exceptions, or the record proper, and the judgment of conviction must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting en banc. We are of the-opinion, and hold, that the same was sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment rendered thereon. There is no other question apparent worthy of discussion.

We find no prejudicial error anywhere, either in the bill of exceptions, or the record proper, and the judgment of conviction must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coker-v-state-alactapp-1930.