Coker v. Hopper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Coker v. Hopper

244 S.E.2d 873, 241 Ga. 288, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 977

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 27, 1978

Docket33429

StatusPublished

This text of 244 S.E.2d 873 (Coker v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coker v. Hopper, 244 S.E.2d 873, 241 Ga. 288, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 977 (Ga. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Bowles, Justice.

Coker appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court found that the petition was successive. We reverse.

Appellant and Carl J. Isaacs filed a habeas corpus petition in Civil Action No. 76-100, to challenge all statutes authorizing a life sentence. At that time, petitioner was serving a death sentence, affirmed in 234 Ga. 555 (216 SE2d 782) (1975), and reversed on appeal to the United States Supreme Court. See Coker v. Georgia, 433 U. S. 584 (97 SC 2861) (1977). The habeas corpus court found that the petitioners were not attacking the sentences which they were then serving and, therefore, their petition failed to state grounds for habeas corpus Relief. The petition was dismissed with prejudice, without having been heard on its merits.

In the instant application, Civil Action No. 77-209, appellant challenges his sentences of life and eight years imposed under a plea of guilty to rape and aggravated assault, which offenses occurred before those described in Coker v. State, 234 Ga. 555 (216 SE2d 782)(1975).

Petitioner has not had a habeas corpus petition considered on its merits. Therefore, the instant application is not successive and should be considered in the trial court.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowles, Justice.

Coker appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court found that the petition was successive. We reverse.

Appellant and Carl J. Isaacs filed a habeas corpus petition in Civil Action No. 76-100, to challenge all statutes authorizing a life sentence. At that time, petitioner was serving a death sentence, affirmed in 234 Ga. 555 (216 SE2d 782) (1975), and reversed on appeal to the United States Supreme Court. See Coker v. Georgia, 433 U. S. 584 (97 SC 2861) (1977). The habeas corpus court found that the petitioners were not attacking the sentences which they were then serving and, therefore, their petition failed to state grounds for habeas corpus Relief. The petition was dismissed with prejudice, without having been heard on its merits.

In the instant application, Civil Action No. 77-209, appellant challenges his sentences of life and eight years imposed under a plea of guilty to rape and aggravated assault, which offenses occurred before those described in Coker v. State, 234 Ga. 555 (216 SE2d 782)(1975).

Petitioner has not had a habeas corpus petition considered on its merits. Therefore, the instant application is not successive and should be considered in the trial court.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 S.E.2d 873, 241 Ga. 288, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coker-v-hopper-ga-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack