Coker v. Duncan

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Coker v. Duncan

102 S.E. 18, 113 S.C. 204, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 49

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 26, 1920

Docket10330

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 18 (Coker v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coker v. Duncan, 102 S.E. 18, 113 S.C. 204, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 49 (S.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The appellant having failed to file points and authorities, as required by the rules of the Court, but states in the record that “submitted without argument,” the appeal must be dismissed; but, even without this, under the recent case of Lena Robison v. G. M. Barton, 102 S. E. 16, opinion of Chief Justice, and authorities cited by him therein, on the merits, the appeal would be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

The appellant having failed to file points and authorities, as required by the rules of the Court, but states in the record that “submitted without argument,” the appeal must be dismissed; but, even without this, under the recent case of Lena Robison v. G. M. Barton, 102 S. E. 16, opinion of Chief Justice, and authorities cited by him therein, on the merits, the appeal would be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E. 18, 113 S.C. 204, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coker-v-duncan-sc-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack