Coker v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

625 S.E.2d 785, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1255, 2005 WL 3709115
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coker v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.. Read the opinion of the Court — 360 N.C. 398
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 1, 2005·No. 532A05·Published

Opinion

625 S.E.2d 785 (2005)

COKER, et al.
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.

No. 532A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Mona Lisa Wallace, Salisbury, Cathy Williams, K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, Gary K. Shipman, Wilmington, for James Coker, et al.

William G. Wright, for Plaintiff.

Allison O. Van Laningham, Greensboro, Raymond M. Kethledge, Troy, MI, for DaimlerChrysler Corp.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of November 2005 by Defendant to Amend Record on Appeal:

*786 "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of December 2005."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coker v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP., 625 S.E.2d 785, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1255, 2005 WL 3709115 (N.C. 2005).

625 S.E.2d 785 (Coker v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.