Coker v. City of Tifton
72 S.E. 606, 10 Ga. App. 66, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 648
Opinion
1. Questions involving the validity of a municipal ordinance and the jurisdiction of the trial court, not made in that court, and raised for the first time on certiorari in the superior court, will not be considered by the latter court, or by this court. Sutton v. Washington, 4 Ga. App. 30 (60 S. E. 811) ; S., F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Hardin, 110 Ga. 433 (35 S. E. 681).
2. No error of law appears, and the verdict fully supports the finding of the trial court. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coker v. City of Tifton, 72 S.E. 606, 10 Ga. App. 66, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 648 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
72 S.E. 606 (Coker v. City of Tifton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Hardin
35 S.E. 681 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Sutton v. Mayor of Washington
60 S.E. 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)