Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc.

167 S.E. 412, 168 S.C. 242

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 4, 1933

Docket13548

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 167 S.E. 412 (Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc., 167 S.E. 412, 168 S.C. 242 (S.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

[249]*249The agreed statement of facts, and the decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Dennis, in this case will be reported. All the exceptions are overruled, and the decree is affirmed. See the decision of this Court in the recent case of Ex parte G. D. Sanders, petitioner, appellant (In re South Carolina Savings Bank, petitioner, In re The Liquidation of the Affairs of the Bamberg Banking Company, The South Carolina Savings Bank as Receiver, respondent). 167 S. E., 154.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

[249]*249The agreed statement of facts, and the decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Dennis, in this case will be reported. All the exceptions are overruled, and the decree is affirmed. See the decision of this Court in the recent case of Ex parte G. D. Sanders, petitioner, appellant (In re South Carolina Savings Bank, petitioner, In re The Liquidation of the Affairs of the Bamberg Banking Company, The South Carolina Savings Bank as Receiver, respondent). 167 S. E., 154.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 S.E. 412, 168 S.C. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coker-v-bank-of-darlington-inc-sc-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack