Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc.

167 S.E. 412, 168 S.C. 242

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 4, 1933·No. 13548·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

[249] The agreed statement of facts, and the decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Dennis, in this case will be reported. All the exceptions are overruled, and the decree is affirmed. See the decision of this Court in the recent case of Ex parte G. D. Sanders, petitioner, appellant (In re South Carolina Savings Bank, petitioner, In re The Liquidation of the Affairs of the Bamberg Banking Company, The South Carolina Savings Bank as Receiver, respondent). 167 S. E., 154.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

[249] The agreed statement of facts, and the decree of his Honor, Circuit Judge Dennis, in this case will be reported. All the exceptions are overruled, and the decree is affirmed. See the decision of this Court in the recent case of Ex parte G. D. Sanders, petitioner, appellant (In re South Carolina Savings Bank, petitioner, In re The Liquidation of the Affairs of the Bamberg Banking Company, The South Carolina Savings Bank as Receiver, respondent). 167 S. E., 154.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham concur.

Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc., 167 S.E. 412, 168 S.C. 242 (S.C. 1933).

Pincite

167 S.E. 412 (Coker v. Bank of Darlington, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related