Coker v. A. C. Rogers, Inc.

26 So. 2d 164, 157 Fla. 415, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 755
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 14, 1946·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The questions on this appeal are stated in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice ADAMS which will be published and, therefore, it is not necessary to repeat them here.

A majority of the court is of the view that the remittitur required by the court below to prevent an order for a new trial was excessive and that a remittitur in the sum of $7,500.00 was as much as is warranted by the facts disclosed by the record.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the lower court entered on the 4th day of December, 1944, be modified so as to allow a remittitur in the sum of $7,500.00 and thereupon the judgment stand affirmed in the sum of $12,500.00 as of the date of entry thereof.

So ordered.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and SEBRING, JJ., concur. THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coker v. A. C. Rogers, Inc., 26 So. 2d 164, 157 Fla. 415, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 755 (Fla. 1946).

26 So. 2d 164 (Coker v. A. C. Rogers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dundee Corporation v. Lee
24 So. 2d 234 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Allen v. Hooper
171 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Ellis
140 So. 918 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Duval v. Hunt
34 Fla. 85 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1894)
Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Foxworth
41 Fla. 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1899)
Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Davis
45 Fla. 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Foxworth
45 Fla. 278 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)