Coker, Sandra v. Storm Power Components

2019 TN WC 182
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedDecember 16, 2019
Docket2018-01-0137
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 182 (Coker, Sandra v. Storm Power Components) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coker, Sandra v. Storm Power Components, 2019 TN WC 182 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Dec 16, 2019 04:00 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA Sandra Coker, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0137 Employee, ) Vv. ) Storm Power Components, ) State File No.: 14421-2018 Employer, ) and ) Bridgefield Employers Ins. Co., ) Judge Thomas Wyatt Carrier. ) )

COMPENSATION HEARING ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This claim came before the Court on December 13, 2019, for argument of Storm Power Components’ motion for summary judgment. Attorney Rebecca Hicks represented Sandra Coker, and Attorney Amy Brown represented Storm Power during the hearing.

Ms. Coker filed this claim almost two years ago alleging that her serious respiratory condition arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment at Storm Power, which allegedly exposed her to certain environmental hazards. Storm Power sought discovery from Ms. Coker, including identification of experts she would rely on in support of her claim. Ms. Coker failed to identify experts. Storm Power filed its summary judgment motion seeking dismissal because Ms. Coker could not come forward with expert medical testimony that her condition was work- related.

After Storm Power filed its motion, Ms. Coker sought additional time to locate an expert. The Court granted Ms. Coker an additional sixty days to locate an expert and submit evidence in support of her claim. That time has passed.

Ms. Hicks announced that Ms. Coker had decided not to pursue her claim. She provided no expert opinion supporting the work-relatedness of her condition. Storm Power relied on its motion and asked the Court to dismiss the claim on summary judgment.

In King v. Kasei North America, Inc., 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 16, at *6, 9-10 (Apr. 4, 2019), the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board held:

[s}ummary judgment is appropriate "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In circumstances where a motion for summary judgment is filed by a party who does not bear the burden of proof at trial, "the moving party may satisfy its burden of production either (1) by affirmatively negating an essential element of the nonmoving party's claim or (2) by demonstrating that the nonmoving party's evidence at the summary judgment stage is insufficient to establish the nonmoving party's claim or defense.”

(Citations omitted.)

In King, the court granted the employee two extensions to submit expert opinions in response to summary judgment, but she did not do so. The Appeals Board held that summary judgment of the entire claim was appropriate under the second prong of the standard, even though the employer only negated the compensability of one of the employee’s alleged injuries.

Here, Ms. Coker has the burden of proving all the essential elements of her claim, which requires an expert medical opinion that her work “contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the death, disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes.” See Panzarella v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 2015-01-0383, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *9-11 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. May 15, 2017). She has had almost two years to obtain expert evidence supporting her claim. Even though the Court followed the scheduling format of Rule 56 and, in fact, extended Ms. Coker’s time to obtain evidence supporting her claim, she conceded that she had no evidence to present.

For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants summary judgment and dismisses Ms. Coker’s claim with prejudice to its refiling. The Court taxes the filing fee of $150.00 to Storm Power under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations Rule 0800-02-21- .06. Further, Storm Power shall prepare and submit a Statistical Data Form for this matter within ten calendar days of the date of judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED December 16, 2019.

Judge Thomas Wyatt Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on December 16, 2019.

Name Certified | Email | Service sent to: Mail Rebecca Hicks Xx hickslaw@volstate.net Employee’s Attorney aschaefer@volstate.net Nick Peterson x Nick.peterson@petersonwhite.com Employer’s Attorney Beverly.uphoff@petersonwhite.com Fonm( Town. rheunuanee? Penny Shrum, Court Clerk m WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Compensation Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. A licensed court reporter must prepare a transcript and file it with the court clerk within fifteen calendar days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement of the evidence before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the court clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Compensation Hearing Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667. COMPENSATION HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation iwww.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(c)(7)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coker-sandra-v-storm-power-components-tennworkcompcl-2019.