Cokely v. Stipp

83 Pa. Super. 184, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 4, 1924·No. Appeal, 21·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal from judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense; it is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Newcomb.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cokely v. Stipp, 83 Pa. Super. 184, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

83 Pa. Super. 184 (Cokely v. Stipp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acme Cotton Products Co. v. Michael McDonough, Inc.
61 Pa. D. & C.2d 608 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Medusa Portland Cement Co. v. Marion Coal & Supply Co.
201 A.2d 285 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)