Cokely v. Stipp
83 Pa. Super. 184, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 4, 1924
DocketAppeal, 21
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 83 Pa. Super. 184 (Cokely v. Stipp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cokely v. Stipp, 83 Pa. Super. 184, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
This is an appeal from judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense; it is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Newcomb.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Acme Cotton Products Co. v. Michael McDonough, Inc.
61 Pa. D. & C.2d 608 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Medusa Portland Cement Co. v. Marion Coal & Supply Co.
201 A.2d 285 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
83 Pa. Super. 184, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cokely-v-stipp-pasuperct-1924.