Coitrone, Michael v. Robert Fulton dba Bob's Construction

2017 TN WC 121
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims·Decided June 21, 2017·No. 2016-04-0305·Published

Opinion

FILED Jun e 2 1,,2017

TNCOURTOF Vi 'OR.KIRS' COMFE.N.SATION ,CLAIMS

Time 8 :lfi tU.J: TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT COOKEVILLE

MICHAEL COITRONE, ) Docket No.: 2016-04-0305 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 79982-2016 ) R01;JERT FULTON D/B/A/ BOB'S ) Judge Robert Durham CONSTRUCTION, ) Uninsured Employer. ) )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on June 9, 2017, upon the Request for Expedited Hearing (REH) filed by Michael Coitrone. 1 Mr. Coitrone filed the Request to determine whether Robert Fulton, d/b/a Bob's Construction, is obligated to provide workers' compensation benefits for his July 15, 2016 work injury, and if so, to what extent he is entitled to medical benefits and temporary disability benefits. The Court holds the evidence submitted by Mr. Coitrone is sufficient to establish he is likely to prevail in proving he was Mr. Fulton's employee when he sustained a work-related injury on July 15, 2016; thus, he is entitled to reimbursement for emergent care expenses as well as a panel of physicians from which he may choose an authorized treating physician. However, the Court further finds Mr. Coitrone did not provide sufficient evidence at this time to establish entitlement to temporary disability benefits.

History of Claim

According to his testimony, Mr. Fulton hired Mr. Coitrone to work as a carpenter beginning on July 14, 2016, at $15.00 per hour based on a fifty-hour workweek. Mr. Fulton picked him up from a McDonald's restaurant on the 14th and drove him to a worksite located in Putnam County. 2 Mr. Coitrone noticed Mr. Fulton talking to another

1 Mr. Fulton did not attend the Expedited Hearing and did not respond in any way to the Notice of Expedited Hearing sent to his listed address. 2 Since Mr. Coitrone had moved to Tennessee only a few weeks before and only worked for Mr. Fulton for two days gentleman about the project but could not say whether he was the homeowner or a general contractor.

The following day, Mr. Fulton again picked Mr. Coitrone up from McDonald's and drove him to the worksite. While working on the second floor of a garage, Mr. Coitrone fell through the floor and landed on concrete several feet below, causing injuries to his head, right wrist, and low back. Mr. Fulton and a co-worker assisted Mr. Coitrone to Cookeville Regional Medical Center's emergency room.

According to CRMC records, Mr. Coitrone suffered a laceration to the back of his head that required stapling as well as a right wrist sprain and severe back pain. Mr. Coitrone also testified he suffered an injury to his left shoulder. He underwent x-rays of his right wrist, thoracic spine, and chest, as well as a CT scan of his head, none of which revealed any abnormal findings. An x-ray of his lumbar spine revealed compression fractures at L3 and L4, which were "probably acute." Dr. William Gailmard, the emergency room physician, called for a consultation with a neurosurgeon, but Mr. Coitrone chose to be discharged before the consult occurred. Dr. Gailmard counseled Mr. Coitrone to seek outpatient follow-up with a neurosurgeon, prescribed pain medication, and discharged him from care. (Ex. 1.)

Mr. Coitrone did not submit any additional medical records, although he did introduce several medical bills, which he testified were incurred as a result of the accident. 3 Expenses incurred on July 15 for CRMC's emergency room, Dr. Gailford's services, and Cumberland Imaging Services total $3,589.84. (Exs. 8, 9, 10.)

Mr. Coitrone attempted to obtain workers' compensation benefits from Mr. Fulton, but when he discovered Mr. Fulton did not have workers' compensation insurance, he contacted the Bureau of Workers' Compensation Ombudsman's office for assistance. On September 9, 2016, a Request for Investigation to determine whether Mr. Fulton was required to comply with workers' compensation law was filed with the Bureau of Workers' Compensation. The Investigation Report determined that Mr. Fulton found the job; controlled the right of termination; provided transportation to and from the worksite, thus setting the work hours; controlled the right to hire helpers; and furnished all tools and equipment. (Ex. 6.)

Mr. Coitrone testified that he has not been able to work since the date of the accident. However, the Bureau investigation report included several text messages between Mr. Coitrone and Mr. Fulton from late July to early August 2016 in which Mr. Coitrone asked Mr. Fulton for work. (Ex. 4.) Mr. Coitrone also testified that he continues to suffer from back pain as well as cluster headaches, which he attributes to his

before his injury, he could not identify the exact location of the worksite. 3 Some of the bills included services provided at CRMC's emergency room on June 23, 2016, and were not included in the calculation stated above.

2 accident.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

As in all workers' compensation actions, Mr. Coitrone, as the claimant, has the burden of proof on the essential elements of his claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). However, since this is an expedited hearing, he only has to come forward with sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in order to meet his burden. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

With regard to Mr. Coitrone's employment status with Mr. Fulton, the Court finds the undisputed evidence establishes Mr. Coitrone is likely to prove he was Mr. Fulton's employee, as opposed to an independent contractor, at the time of the injury on July 15, 2016. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(12)(D)(i) (2016) sets forth the following factors for making this determination as follows:

(a) The right to control the conduct of the work; (b) The right of termination; (c) The method of payment; (d) The freedom to select and hire helpers; (e) The furnishing of tools and equipment; (f) Self-scheduling of working hours; and (g) The freedom to offer services to other entities.

Mr. Coitrone testified he was Mr. Fulton's employee; he further testified he was to be paid on hourly basis and that he was driven to and from the jobsite by Mr. Fulton, who dictated his schedule. Furthermore, the UEF Investigation Report determined that Mr. Fulton found the job, controlled the hiring of helpers, and provided tools and equipment for the construction project. Mr. Fulton did not appear at the hearing to provide testimony to the contrary. As a result, the Court finds at this stage that Mr. Coitrone provided sufficient evidence to show he is likely to prove he was an employee of Mr. Fulton at the time of his work-related injury.

Since Mr. Coitrone was Mr. Fulton's employee, the Court further finds that Mr. Fulton was subject to the Workers' Compensation Law, given that construction contractors must provide benefits to injured workers even if they only have one employee. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-902(a) (2016). Thus, Mr. Coitrone is entitled to workers' compensation benefits for any injury causally related to his employment with Mr. Fulton.

In order to prevail on causation, Mr. Coitrone must establish he suffered an

3 accidental injury that was "caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, ansmg primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, and is identifiable by time and place of occurrence." Tenn. Code Ann.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coitrone, Michael v. Robert Fulton dba Bob's Construction, 2017 TN WC 121 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2017).

2017 TN WC 121 (Coitrone, Michael v. Robert Fulton dba Bob's Construction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buchanan v. Mission Insurance Co.
713 S.W.2d 654 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1986)