Coit v. Bull

Connecticut Superior Court

Coit v. Bull

1 Kirby 149

DecidedSeptember 15, 1786

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 149 (Coit v. Bull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coit v. Bull, 1 Kirby 149 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Pincite

Opinion

By the whole Court.

In this case it appears, that the sendee of the foreign attachment on the defendant, was prior to the assignment of the note to Morris & Lawrence; and after service, the original promisee could have no right to receive or dispose of the debt contained in the note, without first satisfying the plaintiff’s demand.

It veas further objected by the plaintiff, that notes are not by law transferable in this state; but it is not necessary, in this case, to give an opinion on that point.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

In this case it appears, that the sendee of the foreign attachment on the defendant, was prior to the assignment of the note to Morris & Lawrence; and after service, the original promisee could have no right to receive or dispose of the debt contained in the note, without first satisfying the plaintiff’s demand.

It veas further objected by the plaintiff, that notes are not by law transferable in this state; but it is not necessary, in this case, to give an opinion on that point.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coit-v-bull-connsuperct-1786.