Coin Novelty Co. v. Lindenborn
122 A.D. 885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1907·Published
Opinion
The order appealed from must be so modified as to strike out of the order for defendant’s examination so much as directs him to produce for inspection certain books and papers. (Gee v. Pendas, 87 App. Div. 157; Matter of Sands, 98 id. 148.) As so modified, the order will be affirmed, without costs. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke, Scott and Lambert, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coin Novelty Co. v. Lindenborn, 122 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
122 A.D. 885 (Coin Novelty Co. v. Lindenborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gee v. Pendas
87 A.D. 157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)